View F · Roster Building Value

What is each pick worth to the cap?

The trade-value chart prices picks by career AV. This page prices them by surplus over the rookie deal: the open-market AAV a player’s career outcome would command, minus what the rookie wage scale charged you. Positional impact is layered on as a small multiplier — premium positions (QB, edge, OT, WR, CB) get a bump; commodity positions (RB, ST) get a discount. This is the lens that actually drives roster construction.

Expected surplus by pick

Smoothed average surplus ($M / year) at each overall pick #1–262, across 11 settled classes (20112021). The zero line is break-even on the rookie deal — picks above it returned more value than they cost; picks below were money-losers on average.

How to read it
  • Y axis: the typical annual surplus a pick at this slot returned. +$10M / yr means the average player drafted there generated $10M more in market value per year than the rookie deal cost.
  • Above zero = the rookie deal was a bargain on average. Below zero= the average pick at that slot didn’t earn back the rookie cost (busts dragged the mean down).
  • The drop: the steeper this curve falls, the bigger the gap between early and late picks in cap-room terms. A flat curve would mean Day 3 picks are just as valuable per dollar as the top of round 1.
  • vs. the trade-value chart: that chart prices picks by raw career AV produced. This one prices them by surplus over the rookie deal — which is what GMs are actually buying when they trade up.
Y axis
+0+5+10#1#32#64#96#128#160#192#224#256
Surplus $M / yr
zero line = break-even on rookie deal

Hover / tap to see per-pick numbers. Surplus = (vet market AAV at outcome tier) − (rookie AAV at this pick), weighted by position.

Surplus by position × round

Mean weighted surplus per cell. Cells use the position’s own accent color when surplus is positive and switch to red when surplus is negative; opacity scales with magnitude. Watch how the picture inverts vs. the AV-based heatmap on /positional: RB cells fade, late-round OL and DB cells stay strong, and QB cells dominate the top of the table.

How to read it
  • Each cell is a position × round combination. The number is the mean weighted surplus AAV ($M / year) across every pick made at that combo since 2011.
  • Color = sign of the surplus. Positive cells are tinted with the position’s own accent color (the same color used in the row label) — so each row reads as its own monochrome ramp. Red cells = negative surplus on average (busts dragged the mean below zero).
  • Opacity = magnitude, normalized within each position row. A faded cell means small (or zero) surplus; a vivid cell means a big number. The scale resets per row, so dim positions (QB, TE) read fairly against common ones (OL, DB).
  • Read across a rowto see how that position’s ROI erodes from round 1 to round 7. Steep erosion = the position is hard to find late. Slow erosion = depth available.
  • Read down a column to see which positions are best spent at a given round. R1: QB / OL / DL dominate. R5–R7: RB and ST can flip red-negative; OL / DB still hit cheaply.
  • Tap a cell to see its top earner — the pick at that position × round combo with the highest weighted surplus.
Switch the metric with the buttons above the grid: Mean $/yr = avg per pick, Median = middle pick (less skewed by superstars), Cell total = sum of 4-yr surpluses (volume-weighted), Surplus rate = % of picks that were break-even-or-better.
Color by
QB
RB
WR
TE
OL
DL
LB
DB
ST
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7

← swipe · Position color = positive surplus · Red = negative · opacity scales within each row · tap a cell for its top earner

n = 3838 picks · 20112025 · settled window 20112021 · 2024-anchor dollars · smoothing ±5 picks